Buy on Amazon
$270
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1804 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-3635QM - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3635QM
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
