Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2636 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Core i7-3635QM - 51 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3635QM
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
