Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3615QM outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3615QM is 35 days older than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G640 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |