Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3615QM outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3615QM is 218 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 275 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3615QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
