Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3537 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-3612QM - 124 vs 116 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |