Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2797 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2920XM - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $557.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |