Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1408 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $88.99 vs $128.89
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-6300 - $0.75 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2700K - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
118
91.47286821705426%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58289 minutes ago
Buy for $128.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
52.6148969889065%
Multi-Core
2264
89.16896415911776%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |