Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Core i3-3240T - 188 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - $25.7 vs $243.67
- Up to 88% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-11700KF - $0.15 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
11%
Price, $
$243.67
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $243.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
176
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |