Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $25.7 vs $469.99
- Up to 94% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900KF - $0.1 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3240T - 285 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 32 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 655 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
6%
Price, $
$469.99
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 656 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |