Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 46% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3240T - 648 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - $25.7 vs $220.47
- Up to 82% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-11700 - $0.06 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
648
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
17%
Price, $
$220.47
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $220.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4415 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
443
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |