Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 489 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G6900 - 411 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |