Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-10700K vs Core i9-13900F

Core i7-10700K vs Core i9-13900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-10700K

3.8 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for $230 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3997 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900F

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $435 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3996 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-10700K

3.8 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for $230 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3997 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900F

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $435 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3996 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K

  • Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $230.0 vs $435.0
  • Up to 35% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900F - $1.1 vs $1.69 per FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F

  • Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Core i7-10700K - 257 vs 209 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
This is a free version of Rust.
Rust

Rust

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

209

81%

Value, $/FPS

$1.1/FPS

100%

Price, $

$230

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for $230 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3997 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

257

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.69/FPS

65%

Price, $

$435

52%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz

Buy for $435 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3996 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1706

62%

Multi-Core

8142

47%

Intel Core i9-13900F Logo
Core i9-13900F

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2730

100%

Multi-Core

17219

100%

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo

Intel Core i7-10700K

vs
Intel Core i9-13900F Logo

Intel Core i9-13900F

Apr 30th, 2020Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Core i7CollectionCore i9
Comet LakeCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 1200SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
24
16Threads
32
3.8 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
5.1 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
125 WTDPNot Available
14 nmProcess Size
10 nm
38.0x
Multiplier20.0x
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i7-10700K or Core i9-13900F

Rust, 1920 x 1080, High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.