Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3240T - 220 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $25.7 vs $201.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $201.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75423 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.729528535980148%
Multi-Core
971
13.42829484165399%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |