Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $201.99 vs $325.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-10700F - 206 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $201.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74457 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
93.23308270676691%
Multi-Core
7231
72.09371884346959%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |