Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $225.99 vs $317.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-13700KF - $1.67 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - 161 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10248 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
84%
Price, $
$317.99
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |