Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400T outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400T is 1454 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400T - 20 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |