Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G3930T - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $39.0 vs $130.73
- Up to 70% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-8400 - $0.21 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3552 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |