Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1653 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G6900 - 137 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $59.99 vs $188.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-7640X - $0.44 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
31%
Price, $
$188.88
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
112 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |