Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 778 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $25.7 vs $100.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-760 - $0.18 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3836 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
