Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - $75.0 vs $197.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600 - $0.6 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - 150 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
45%
Price, $
$197.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |