Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $80.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-11600KF - $1.33 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 87 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-661 - 92 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 12 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
60
65.21739130434783%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4139 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
81.59509202453988%
Price, $
$150
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |