Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $80.0 vs $85.13
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-661 - 205 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-661 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 973 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |