Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2828 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $80.0 vs $130.73
- Up to 35% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-8400 - $0.54 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-661 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-661 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 816 minutes ago
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |