Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1039 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 52% better in F1 23 than FX-4130 - 221 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 91 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |