Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 1032 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240T - 150 vs 144 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-6500 - $25.7 vs $39.51
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75086 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
37.97790994052676%
Multi-Core
971
30.183400683866957%
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |