Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 454 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $25.7 vs $46.41
- Up to 45% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - $0.23 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240T - 111 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17586 minutes ago
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |