Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 801 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $79.0 vs $557.04
- Up to 86% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-7920X - $0.5 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Saints Row than Core i5-6400 - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9833 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
14%
Price, $
$557.04
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |