Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $79.0 vs $529.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900F - $0.29 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i5-6400 - 289 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9312 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
15%
Price, $
$529.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |