Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 864 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3210 - 122 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $70.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-5675C - $0.6 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 55 vs 65 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
81.08108108108108%
Price, $
$90
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
116
95.08196721311475%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
37.985074626865675%
Multi-Core
1018
24.957097327776413%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |