Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $70.0 vs $124.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-10600KF - $0.12 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3210 - 740 vs 607 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6021 minutes ago
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |