Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-5675C is 599 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 67% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - 184 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - $0.49 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $63.92 vs $90.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 51 vs 65 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
71%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
59.78260869565217%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
84.48275862068965%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
45.37313432835821%
Multi-Core
1043
25.56999264525619%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |