Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $139.51 vs $225.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-10900F - $0.88 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Saints Row than Core i5-4670 - 166 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 20 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
158
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5435 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |