Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $147.22 vs $179.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.83 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4590T - 204 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
177
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $147.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
94%
Price, $
$179.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |