Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i5-4258U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 461 days newer than Core i5-4258U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4258U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 28 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4258U - 122 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4258U - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-4258U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4258U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 5100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
