Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550S is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1620 - 240 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $49.0 vs $149.95
- Up to 66% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-3550S - $0.21 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
33.87096774193548%
Price, $
$149.95
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5837 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
232
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5838 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
67.82752902155887%
Multi-Core
723
42.579505300353354%
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |