Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $49.0 vs $127.07
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 55 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1620 - 145 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for $127.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
18.153573013759434%
Multi-Core
723
9.85416382717732%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |