Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $49.0 vs $179.12
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Celeron G1620 - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for $179.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
29.44564434845212%
Multi-Core
723
16.210762331838566%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |