Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $335.0 vs $435.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3550 - 167 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74010 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
639
23.406593406593405%
Multi-Core
1896
11.011092397932517%
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |