Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1775 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 34% better in F1 23 than Core i5-3427U - 195 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3427U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
