Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 233 days older than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3427U - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 6 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3427U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
