Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1668 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-3230M - 120 vs 116 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |