Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3376 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-2537M - 229 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2537M - 20 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2537M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |