Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 133 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i5-2467M - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 8 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |