Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3256 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2467M - 175 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6645 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |