Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $70.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900F - $0.28 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Core i5-2400S - 289 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3485 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |