Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $70.0 vs $521.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 41% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2400S - 164 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75679 minutes ago
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
16.423841059602648%
Multi-Core
1352
7.4001094690749865%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |