Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G540 - 132 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $19.25 vs $199.98
- Up to 89% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - $0.17 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $199.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
110
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |