Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than FX-6100 - 132 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $29.65 vs $180.49
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $180.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75183 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |