Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 64% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3240T - 228 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $25.7 vs $209.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-14400F - $0.18 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
19%
Price, $
$209.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19531 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
139
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |