Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G540 - 136 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $19.25 vs $259.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - $0.17 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
110
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |